Questionnaire for diagnosing asthma-COPD overlap in COPD: Development of ACO screening questionnaire (ACO-Q).

BACKGROUND: The considerable prevalence and worse outcomes of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) in COPD have been reported, and optimal introduction of ICS is essential for ACO. However, diagnostic criteria for ACO consist of multiple laboratory tests, which is challenging during this COVID-19 era. The purpose of this study was to create a simple questionnaire to diagnose ACO in patients with COPD. METHODS: Among 100 COPD patients, 53 were diagnosed with ACO based on the Japanese Respiratory Society Guidelines for ACO. Firstly, 10 candidate questionnaire items were generated and further selected by a logistic regression model. An integer-based scoring system was generated based on the scaled estimates of items. RESULTS: Five items, namely a history of asthma, wheezing, dyspnea at rest, nocturnal awakening, and weather- or season-dependent symptoms, contributed significantly to the diagnosis of ACO in COPD. History of asthma was related to FeNO >35 ppb. Two points were assigned to history of asthma and 1 point to other items in the ACO screening questionnaire (ACO-Q), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.883 (95% CI: 0.806-0.933). The best cutoff point was 1 point, and the positive predictive value was 100% at a cutoff of 3 points or higher. The result was reproducible in the validation cohort of 53 patients with COPD. CONCLUSIONS: A simple questionnaire, ACO-Q, was developed. Patients with scores ≥3 could be reasonably recommended to be treated as ACO, and additional laboratory testing would be recommended for patients with 1 and 2 points.

[THE OVERLAPPING ELIGIBILITY FOR BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE ASTHMA AND PHENOTYPES].

BACKGROUND: Biologics are an important treatment option for patients with severe asthma. Four biologics are available in Japan, and an overlapping eligibility has been observed. The eligibility and availability of drugs depend on the local regulations of different countries. However, there is no precise information about the eligibility for biologics, including dupilumab, in Japan. The aim of the study was to investigate the overlapping eligibility and to analyze the phenotypes of patients with multiple eligibility. METHODS: In this observational study, a retrospective chart review of patients was performed. The eligibility criteria for omalizumab were IgE 30-1500IU/mL and positive IgE for perennial aeroallergen. The eligibility criteria for IL-5-targeted biologics (mepolizumab and benralizumab) were eosinophil counts (Eos) > 150µL, while those for dupilumab were Eos > 150µL or fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) > 150ppb or IgE > 167IU/mL. Severe asthma was defined by the severity criteria under treatment based on Japanese guidelines for adult asthma. RESULTS: One hundred patients with severe asthma were identified. The eligibility for omalizumab, IL-5-targeted therapies, and dupilumab was 43%, 69%, and 82%, respectively. Thirty percent of the patients were eligible for all the four biologics and showed the lowest FEV1, frequent exacerbation history, and the highest levels of Eos, FeNO, and serum periostin. Only 11% of the patients were not indicated for any biologics. CONCLUSION: A considerable portion of patients was eligible for all the biologics. Asthma control was poor, and type 2 inflammation was prominent in such patients.